Outputs

Below are the outputs from our project including project reports, blogs, lectures and submissions to the Haass All-Party Talks.

 

Bibliography

Blogs

Conference Documents

Conference Videos

Project Reports

  • March 2015
    Investigations, Prosecutions, and the ‘Public Interest’
    By Gordon Anthony, Luke Moffett, Kieran McEvoy & Louise Mallinder

    This report examines the role that investigations and prosecutions play in the context of the Northern Ireland transition by considering: Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and the need for the State to investigate the use of force by state actors such as the police or the army; and the fact that the state will in many cases be investigating acts of violence that were committed by state and non-state actors many years ago.

  • March 2015
    The Historical Use of Amnesties, Immunities, and Sentence Reductions in Northern Ireland
    By Kieran McEvoy, Luke Moffett, Louise Mallinder & Gordon Anthony

    While it is widely believed that the use of amnesties and similar measures would mark a new departure in NI and the UK, so that speculation about their introduction causes public controversy and threatens political instability, the report demonstrates that such measures have in fact been repeatedly used in a wide range of circumstances since the foundation of the NI state. The paper offers definitions of the key measures which have been employed, including amnesties, sentence reductions linked to peace building and use immunities. It explores their historical use and its consequences.

  • March 2015
    Investigations, Prosecutions, and Amnesties under Articles 2 & 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights
    By Louise Mallinder, Luke Moffett, Kieran McEvoy & Gordon Anthony

    This report addresses the procedural legal obligations of states with regard to violations of the right to life (Article 2) and freedom from torture (Article 3) under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), with particular reference to the permissibility of amnesties under the convention.

Stormont House Agreement

  • September 2015
    NIO Policy Paper – Summary of Measures for SHA Bill 2015

    This NIO policy paper sets out what will be included in the Northern Ireland (Stormont House Agreement) Bill announced in the Queen’s Speech 2015.
    The Bill proposes to create the legislative framework for delivery on commitments made in the Stormont House Agreement relating to the legacy of the Troubles.

    For comparative purposes, we include it here alongside the Draft Model Bill prepared by a drafting committee comprised of representatives of the Committee on the Administration of Justice, individual academics and visiting scholars from the Queen’s University of Belfast and the Ulster University

  • SEPTEMBER 2015
    Stormont House Agreement Model Bill – Explanatory Notes

    These explanatory notes relate to the Model Implementation Bill for the Stormont House Agreement prepared by a drafting committee comprised of representatives of the Committee on the Administration of Justice, individual academics and visiting scholars from the Queen’s University of Belfast and the Ulster University (the Model Implementation Bill is published separately here under ‘Stormont House Agreement’ outputs) . These notes have been prepared in order to assist the reader of the Model Bill and to help inform debate on it (referred to as “the Act” in the text of the Model Bill).

  • SEPTEMBER 2015
    Stormont House Agreement Model Implementation Bill

    The Stormont House Agreement (SHA) provides for a set of new institutions to deal with the past in Northern Ireland namely:

    The Historical Investigations Unit (HIU): ‘an independent body to take forward investigations into outstanding Troubles-related deaths.’

    An Independent Commission on Information Retrieval (ICIR) ‘to enable victims and survivors to seek and privately receive information about the deaths of their next of kin.’

    An Oral History Archive ‘to provide a central place to share experiences and narratives related to the Troubles.’

    An Implementation and Reconciliation Group ‘to oversee themes, archives, and information recovery.’

    It also provides recommendations for services for victims and survivors, including a Mental Trauma Service. The implementation of the above SHA institutions requires detailed legislation which is scheduled to be introduced into Westminster in October 2015.

    As part of a collaborative QUB Business Alliance Project between the CAJ and QUB School of Law, led by Professor Kieran McEvoy, an expert drafting group was established to produce an unofficial Model Bill in parallel to the official process. The attached Model Bill is based on the provisions of the Stormont House Agreement, and is designed to provide a benchmark of what the Bill would look like if the Agreement is legislated for in good faith. Those involved in the drafting committee are: Professor Kieran McEvoy (QUB), Daniel Holder (CAJ), Professor Louise Mallinder (TJI), Brian Gormally (CAJ), Jeremy Hill (Visiting Fellow, TJI), Gemma McKeown (CAJ), Anna Bryson (QUB). The group instructed Daniel Greenberg, a barrister specialising in legislation, to draft provisions for the Model Bill.

Submissions to Public Consultations